Lawyers should push on presentence reports
Criminal defense attorney Tim Barkovic made a credible point
last month when he won a delay of a client’s sentencing because he did not
receive the presentence investigation report by the required two days prior to
punishment.
Macomb Circuit Judge David Viviano agreed with Barkovic that
although attorneys rarely receive the reports two days ahead of sentencing, the
objection was technically legitimate. Attorneys typically get the reports late, usually on the day of
sentencing although I'm told sometimes they're available earlier as long as the defense attorney can pick it up at an office.
The reports are completed by probation officers, who work
under the Michigan Department of Corrections, and are important in determining
sentencing guidelines and giving the judge a portrayal of the defendant’s
attitude. Each “psi” recommends a sentence.
Defense attorney Stephen Rabaut said he would like to see
psi’s completed earlier due to their importance in wrangling over sentencing
guidelines and would produce “better lawyering.” In federal court, the reports
are due 45 days before a sentencing.
Maybe more defense attorney objections would force
compliance.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home